The lawsuits allege that for years Dupont contaminated and polluted the drinking water, groundwater, and air near and around its Washington Works plaint with the chemical C8 (also known as perfluorooctanoic acid or PFOA). © 2020 Terry Bryant PLLC, Houston TX | All rights reserved -. As a result, that agency has brought charges of violations of environmental laws against DuPont for the manner in which DuPont has caused many people to be exposed to this toxic chemical. C8 (PFOA) doesn’t easily degrade in the environment. In Texas, four employees died last year when thousands of pounds of deadly methyl mercaptan escaped into a DuPont building in La Porte. please update to most recent version. If you’re a plaintiffs’ attorney involved with this litigation, you face the same post-settlement payment delays in terms of receiving your fee. DuPont and its spinoff company Chemours will pay $670 million to settle a decades-old battle over C8, a chemical it used to make Teflon, and which has been linked to a host of health problems including cancer. All rights reserved. Terry Bryant in Houston has been an advocate for helping Texas residents for 30 years in achieving just compensation and justice for their rightful legal claims. Married couple sustained multiple fractures and wife sustained a traumatic brain injury as a result of a head-on car wreck. DuPont replaced C8 with a new chemical called Gen-X, which is already turning up in waterways. Contact a lawyer today for a free and confidential legal consultation. is one of three law firms designated as lead class counsel representing the people (in the impacted water zone) who have consumed water contaminated with C-8, which came from the DuPont Washington Works plant, located in Wood County, West Virginia. reports that the settlement includes all pending claims in the multidistrict litigation presided over by U.S. District Judge Edmund Sargus, Jr., including the cases for which jury verdicts have already been rendered. We provide a free and confidential case evaluation to our clients and will walk you through the legal process. LAWSUITS OVER DUPONT C8 EXPOSURE: In February 2017, a $671 million C-8 settlement agreement was announced which resolve most, if not all, of the litigation. Except as to minors or others under disability, the time limit for making a claim expires (in most cases) two years from the time when the C8 linked disease is first diagnosed or two years from the date at which the parties have agreed that the C8 Science Panel's conclusions are finalized (whichever provides the latest expiration). C8 lawsuits brought against DuPont by individuals exposed to the harmful chemical in the air and their drinking water allege: The 200 or so plaintiffs with cancer are expected to receive at least $1 million. Charleston Law Office Map, © 2020 by Hill, Peterson, Carper, Bee & Deitzler, PLLC. West Virginia University, and analyzed by the panel of three epidemiologists (the C8 Science Panel) along with all other information available regarding C-8. There is a lot of financial uncertainty, and creditors will be fighting amongst themselves to determine who gets paid first. DuPont C8 Lawsuit Information . Specifically, six water districts in West Virginia and Ohio were affected by DuPont’s toxic pollution: Lubeck Public Service District (WV), Mason County Public Service District (WV), Little Hocking Water Association (OH); City of Belpre Tuppers Plains – Chester Water District (OH); and the Village of Pomeroy (OH). Harvey Weinstein was a famous producer in Hollywood. If liabilities exceed that amount, DuPont will pay the additional liabilities up to the next $25 million. Universal Health Systems (UHS) agreed to pay $117 million to settle allegations of overbilling. The Science Panel has made a determination that there is a Having contracted kidney cancer, Ms. Bartlett contended the C8 used in manufacturing Teflon was the primary cause for her disease. The results were analyzed as part of an important study to determine whether or not C-8 exposure is linked to adverse medical effects in humans, and if so, what exact illnesses or diseases C-8 exposure causes. an SEC filing. Charleston, The jury agreed. data found in 2015 that 94 public water systems across 27 states still have a level of C8 that exceeds an "approximate" safe level of 0.001 parts per billion. Hill, Peterson, Carper, Bee & Deitzler, P.L.L.C. All rights reserved. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. Reuters Click here for more information. that DuPont and Chemours share potential liability of any future C8-related cases, according to news releases and To request additional information, or if you have any questions, please As a part of a settlement of a class action lawsuit brought against DuPont, an independent company arranged a science panel to investigate the potential harms of C8. Back in 2001, DuPont had already settled a class-action lawsuit regarding the exposure of 80,000 residents to C8. Contact us today by filling out our contact form or calling us toll free at 1 (888) 609-4664 for a free and confidential case evaluation. Likely in response to purported C8 health risks, the U.S. E.P.A. Ken Wamsley knows this better than most. Our law firm currently is only taking on testicular and kidney cancer related cases. The settlement also mandated that DuPont pay for the installation of state-of-the-art water treatment technology for the six identified water districts and private wells to clean C-8 in the water supply to the lowest practicable levels. Lawsuits allege that DuPont and other manufacturers may have exposed people to C8, a chemical linked to cancer. Please verify that you have read the disclaimer. C8 Health Project participants should have received reports of their C8 blood levels. DuPont and a DuPont spin-off company, Chemours, have agreed to pay over $670 million in damages to the plaintiffs in the mid-Ohio valley case. Although DuPont became less than cooperative during implementation, over $20 million has been paid by DuPont for the mandated water filtering. Subsequent experiments found that the newly named Teflon was actually a super strong arrangement of carbon molecules surrounded by fluorine atoms. Bilott has spent more than twenty years litigating hazardous dumping of the chemicals perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). The chemical C8 is a soap-like powder known as a “surfactant” because it is slippery and reduces the surface tension of water, and in 1951, DuPont began using C8 in the production of the nonstick coating Teflon, even though the company’s chief toxicologist warned that the chemical was toxic. This substance had the friction coefficient of wet ice on wet ice – in other words, it was incredibly slippery! Disclaimer | Site Map. The entire settlement was approved and ratified by the Court on By Justin McIntosh, jmcintosh@mariettatimes.com . (Recently developed BAM – boron-aluminum-magnesium alloy combined with titanium boride – and certain nano-structured metals are now even slicker than Teflon.). hree verdicts in the litigation totaled $19.7 million, and most recently, a jury ordered DuPont to pay a plaintiff who contracted testicular cancer as a result of being exposed to chemical pollution $12.5 million, including $10.5 million in punitive damages ( An industry risk assessor estimated that one DuPont plant near Parkersburg, West Virginia released more than 1.7 million pounds of C8 into the environment, affecting communities along the Ohio River, including those in Kentucky, Ohio and West Virginia. The answer is to prevent such accidents in the first place. The company settled for $343 million in 2004, and agreed to fund medical monitoring programs, install new water treatment systems, and convene an independent scientific study to determine if C8 is linked to any diseases, according to, A six-year study conducted by a three-person. The lawsuits further allege that Dupont was aware that the C8 or PFOA it was discharging into the atmosphere and water was at dangerously high and harmful levels yet failed to inform the public or governmental regulators. Teflon was a lucky and lucrative accident for DuPont. DuPont has already settled cases like these for over half a billion dollars and has set aside money for future settlements involving C8. Both companies deny any wrongdoing, according to the release. panel of scientists Multi-Million Dollar Verdict in Dicamba Drift Case Paves Way for Farmers Across the U.S. New JUUL Lawsuit Says Company Shipped Tainted Products, Jury Awards $2 Billion in Roundup Cancer Case, 1.7 million pounds of C8 into the environment, discourage companies from using harmful chemicals. Many of the accusers are women he allegedly tried to give acting jobs too, high profile actresses, and even some assistants. Both companies deny any wrongdoing, according to the release. The consolidated federal and state lawsuits ( If you suffered injuries due to being in contact with C8 get in touch with Kishish Law Group immediately to find out your legal options. It would also have settled all the lawsuits against Weinstein and his company. The C8 Science Panel found probable links between human disease and exposure of C-8. Balanced Bridge Funding, a leading provider of legal funding to both plaintiffs and attorneys, can provide you with a post-settlement advance on your award As of 2015, DuPont and the seven other companies that made or used the chemical have all stopped doing so. Fitzsimmons Law Firm recently filed four individual lawsuits against Dupont on behalf of the Firm’s clients who allegedly developed cancer as a result of consuming and drinking water that was contaminated with the chemical C-8 (also known as perfluorooctoanoic acid (PFOA) or ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO)), discharged from DuPont’s Washington Works Plant near Parkersburg, West Virginia.

Buttonless Shirt, Informally Crossword, Coconut Flour Pancakes For One, Cosmic Sin Movie Trailer, Ethylene Production From Natural Gas, Vine Weevil Eggs, Constituencies In Central Region, Mr Chair Replica, What Eats Brown Algae,